What We Know
Published on DecĀ 24, 2017 (updated FebĀ 5, 2024), filed under philosophy (feed). (Share this on Mastodon orĀ Bluesky?)
On some days, if you asked me about what we know, with absolute certainty, Iād respond with āonly that something exists.ā And if you asked me what that meant, then Iād add āto appreciate and work with what exists.ā
This seems basal and little. But I donāt see it that way. That something exists is certain; but contrary to how academic philosophy regards this as a tiny foundation to base anything on, I take it as extremely powerful. Something exists. To appreciate and work with what exists, though Iām not sure I wouldnāt later rephrase this, seems likewise powerful to me. What can we do with what exists? What should we do with what exists? Iām not the philosopher yet to develop a conception of freedom out of this, but I recognize the possibility.
Something exists. An immensely unsatisfying non-statement at first, but apart from appearing to be the only thing we can be certain of, it may well be pure magic.
Happy Holidays š
Update (April 7, 2019)
Just as I had learned about Kris McDanielās The Fragmentation of Being (lauded by Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews), here, āsomething existsā is not tied to anything concrete or abstract: āxFx ā āCx(Fx) ⨠āAx(Fx) is not the question; all that matters, for the purposes of this post, is āx.
About Me
Iām Jens (long: Jens Oliver Meiert), and Iām a web developer, manager, and author. Iāve been working as a technical lead and engineering manager for companies youāve never heard of and companies you use every day, Iām an occasional contributor to web standards (like HTML, CSS, WCAG), and I write and review books for OāReilly and Frontend Dogma.
I love trying things, not only in web development and engineering management, but also in other areas like philosophy. Here on meiert.com I share some of my experiences and views. (I value you being critical, interpreting charitably, and giving feedback.)