How to Uncover Pseudo-Standardistas
Published on November 20, 2008 (ā» February 5, 2024), filed under Web Development (RSSĀ feed).
This and many other posts are also available as a pretty, well-behaved ebook: On Web Development.
Thereās a growing group of developers that doesnāt help our attempts for faster, more accessible, more maintainable, and generally quality-oriented web development: pseudo-standardistas. There are several ways to identify pseudos (apart from the hints Henri shared), the easiest being:
-
Pseudo-standardistas report to be member of standard bodies and organizations like e.g. W3C. However, a non-paper member participating in W3C work will usually have at least one results page of entries when reviewing their work, so try searching Google for contributions on W3C mailing lists. (Searching does work for verifying contributions to other initiatives, too.)
-
Pseudo-standardistas like to point out how great valid HTML is (it is, even though validation isnāt everything). Try validating their site to see if they act accordingly (keep the HTML 5 doctype in mindā
<!DOCTYPE html>
ā, which isnāt recognized by the WDG and a few other validators). -
Pseudo-standardistas make maintainability mistakes like working with presentational ID and class names, and using (maybe even recommending) Conditional Comments or multiple style sheet references in the markup. This is a tough call (not everyone will appreciate this) and surely an advanced requirement (many peers donāt find it problematic to link to several style sheets out of their pagesā markup), but still a red flag when it comes to maintainability.
There are more telltales of pseudo-advocates of modern web development (I feel reminded of āvalid this or thatā badges), but at least in German-speaking countries thereās an awkward tendency to rest on laurels not deserved yet. I donāt mind decisive self-promotion and marketing (heck, itās Europeās small answer to Barack Obama writing this post), but we need to ask ourselves if thatās in the best interest of our industry.
About Me
Iām Jens, and Iām an engineering lead and author. Iāve worked as a technical lead for companies like Google, Iām close to W3C and WHATWG, and I write and review books for OāReilly and Frontend Dogma. I love trying things, not only in web development, but also in other areas like philosophy. Here on meiert.com I share some of my views andĀ experiences.
If you have a question or suggestion about what I write, please leave a comment (where applicable) or aĀ message.
Comments (Closed)
-
On November 20, 2008, 21:44 CET, Duluoz said:
Have you ever heard the term armchair quarterback? These are typically individuals who might have, or not, played some high school football, who think they can do better than the quarterbacks they watch on TV in their recliners. Perhaps there is such a thing as armchair standardistas?
-
On November 24, 2008, 12:55 CET, Jens Oliver Meiert said:
David, no, unfortunately not! I like āarmchair standardistaā! š
-
On November 27, 2008, 15:03 CET, Christophe Strobbe said:
Regarding point 1: (a) the mailing lists of some working groups are not public; (b) some other contributions have no public visibility, e.g. filling in questionnaires through the W3Cās WBS; (c) when searching mail archives, check that those mails donāt just say āregretsā (in response to the announcement of a conference call): some people seem to send more āregretsā mails than anything else but donāt want to give up working group āparticipationā because it looks nice on their CVs (and book announcements).
Read More
Maybe of interest to you,Ā too:
- Next: WDR #2: Web Developers Needed for a Website
- Previous: WDR #1: Versioned Style Sheets
- More under Web Development, or fromĀ 2008
- Most popular posts
Looking for a way to comment? Comments have been disabled,Ā unfortunately.
Get a good look at web development? Try WebGlossary.infoāand The Web Development Glossary 3K (2023). With explanations and definitions for thousands of terms of web development, web design, and related fields, building on Wikipedia as well as MDN Web Docs. Available at Apple Books, Kobo, Google Play Books, andĀ Leanpub.