“HTML 5” or “HTML5”?
Published on Sep 11, 2009 (updated Apr 22, 2024), filed under development, html. (Share this post, e.g. on Mastodon or on Bluesky.)
This and 133 other posts are also available as a well-behaved ebook: On Web Development.
It’s “HTML5,” not “HTML 5,” declares the most recent post on the WHATWG blog. A seemingly trivial matter, yet compare that to names of other HTML specifications: HTML 2.0, HTML 3.2, HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0, XHTML 1.1, XHTML 2.0.
Calling HTML 5 “HTML5” is inconsistent and grammatically wrong. I don’t understand the decision. Personally, I’ll continue to reference this version of HTML as… HTML 5.
About Me
I’m Jens (long: Jens Oliver Meiert), and I’m a web developer, manager, and author. I’ve worked as a technical lead and engineering manager for companies you use every day and companies you’ve never heard of, I’m an occasional contributor to web standards (like HTML, CSS, WCAG), and I write and review books for O’Reilly and Frontend Dogma.
I love trying things, not only in web development and engineering management, but also in philosophy. Here on meiert.com I share some of my experiences and perspectives. (I value you being critical, interpreting charitably, and giving feedback.)
