The Assessment Paradox
Published on September 14, 2024, filed under Philosophy and Management (RSS feed for all categories).
Beware, Jens writing Jens things.
For any individual or group A we may think that it can assess itself best because it knows itself best.
This is not reliable, however, because it may not know its effect on other individuals or groups, and because it may have a vested interest in the assessment and its consequences.
We may then think it’s individuals or groups B, C, &c. interacting with that other individual or group A who may be able to assess A.
This is not so, however, because by virtue of permanent exposure (and probably by virtue of existence), A must be able to assess itself better.
Examples
Two examples:
Take myself. I know myself better than you do, pretty much because if there’s one person I’m hanging out with literally all the time, then it’s me. However, I cannot know my effect on you or others, and so you can assess this effect of mine more accurately (though others may be able to do so even better).
Take the field of, say, web development (and therefore the group of web developers). There’s no field who knows web development so well like the field of web development. However, they don’t know as well how they affect others, and they have a vested interest in anything web development.
An Attempt at a Resolution
Can’t we say, then, that in order to assess some individual or group, we need both the individual or group to be assessed, and some individuals or groups they’re affecting?
If there’s anything this means, then yes.
That’s why practically, we do things like 360° feedback.
Yet, there are a number of reasons why this is not sufficient. The most important ones include:
- Each party, especially the individual or group being assessed, has an interest in the assessment and/or its outcomes (i.e., it may be biased).
- It’s usually not possible to get an assessment from all parties involved.
- We bump into severe issues around truth (what is it, how can we confirm it) and completeness (can we attain it, and if not, what does it mean for the assessment).
A Resolution
There is no resolution.
Theoretically it’s possible (and not even hard) to get to one, but it leads to the Absolute where there is no space and time and everything is one.
Practically, however, there is no accurate assessment we can get from or about anyone.
Does the world stop because of this?
No.
But it’s interesting to think about. Is it not.
About Me
I’m Jens (long: Jens Oliver Meiert), and I’m a frontend engineering leader and tech author/publisher. I’ve worked as a technical lead for companies like Google and as an engineering manager for companies like Miro, I’m a contributor to several web standards, and I write and review books for O’Reilly and Frontend Dogma.
I love trying things, not only in web development (and engineering management), but also in other areas like philosophy. Here on meiert.com I share some of my views and experiences. (Be critical, interpret charitably, and send feedback.)
Read More
Maybe of interest to you, too:
- Next: On Ticket Management
- Previous: 2024: 0.5% of the Global Top 200 Websites Use Valid HTML
- More under Philosophy or Management
- More from 2024
- Most popular posts
Looking for a way to comment? Comments have been disabled, unfortunately.
Find adventure anywhere? Try 100 Things I Learned as an Everyday Adventurer (2013). During my time in the States I started trying everything. Everything. Then I noticed that wasn’t only fun, it was also useful. Available at Amazon, Apple Books, Kobo, Google Play Books, and Leanpub.