Jens Meiert

Cost of Solution vs. Cost of Problem

Jens O. Meiert, September 20, 2007 / January 31, 2012.

This entry is filed under .

Problems cost money, and problems require solutions that also cost money. This is known in all industries, but in many cases, there is focus on only one side: What does the solution of the problem cost? This ignores the other side, the cost of the problem.

Evaluating cost of solution is simple: You determine the time and money you need to develop and implement it. You’re looking at the resources needed. Cost of problem, however, equals the price of doing nothing. That is, for what I know, an important economic principle known from cost-benefit analyses.

I recently wrote more on the matter for Germany’s Dr. Web mag, including some detail and examples. Unfortunately, that prevents me from providing more information in this place. The point is this: Always consider the cost of the problem in order to prioritize appropriately. Some changes are unnecessary and expensive, others are critical and must not be delayed.

If you cannot wait until I share any more wisdom: Jeff Thull’s been on the same page.

Read More

Enjoy the most popular posts, possibly including:

Leave a Comment

Unfortunately, comments are closed.

Found a mistake? Reward! Email me, jens@meiert.com.

You are here: meiert.comArchive for 2007 → Cost of Solution vs. Cost of Problem

Last update: January 31, 2012. Copyright 2000-2012 Jens O. Meiert.