Museums Should Always Allow Photography
Post from April 30, 2015 (↻ June 8, 2021), filed under Art and Design (feed).
Side note. I much appreciate museums and have during my long journey around the world alone visited enough to ever want again. A hobby photographer, I like to take photos in these places; alas, there are still too many that prohibit taking any. Here my view on why photography in museums should always be allowed, and just as much in art galleries and like institutions.
Figure: No to the no.
Why Allow Photography?
There are three good reasons for why museum photography should be allowed.
For visitors, photos are a great way to remember places and works, and to research them if so inclined.
For museums and rights holders (and comparable institutions), photography amounts to free, legitimate advertising.
Generally speaking, photography helps to… solidify and promote culture. (Whether that is always so desirable is another matter.)
Or, Why Not Ban Photography?
For all the reasons above, which can’t be in our interest.
I find, however, that prohibiting photography is quite offensive to visitors; it treats them as suspects to engage either in criminal (copyright violations) or anti-social conduct (distracting people).
Most notably, flash photography and professional equipment appear to be sound exceptions for they can either distract other visitors or damage exhibition pieces, or may actually facilitate the so loathed copyright violations.
For alternatives, if museums are so afraid of rights being disregarded, or are at such loss when it comes to how to increase store sales, they could look into selling special photography tickets. (I’ve observed several museums in Asia take this course, and it seemed effective.)
❧ I for my part have begun to avoid places that don’t allow photography. I don’t like to be so sure of my memories of place and pieces to fade, and I’m not amused by the proposition to swap lightweight digital photos for heavy, expensive museum store coffee table books.
I wrote this to collect the thoughts I had when repeatedly running into “no photography” signs, so that they may lend themselves to build a stronger case. Not all in our culture is worth preserving, but what is should not be made artificially inaccessible and scarce. Too, I suppose.
I’m Jens, and I’m an engineering lead and author. I’ve worked as a technical lead for Google, I’m close to W3C and WHATWG, and I write and review books for O’Reilly. I love trying things, sometimes including philosophy, art, and adventure. Here on meiert.com I share some of my views and experiences.
If you have a question or suggestion about what I write, please leave a comment (if available) or a message. Thank you!
On April 30, 2015, 16:00 CEST, Vadim Makeev said:
There’s “Photography Allowed” sign developed by Art. Lebedev Studio, I see it more and more recently in Russian museums: http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/photo-ok/
Maybe this is interesting to you, too:
- Next: Business Practices, Reframed
- Previous: 10 Photos
- More under Art and Design, or from 2015
- Most popular posts
Looking for a way to comment? Comments have been disabled, unfortunately.
Get a good look at web development? Try The Web Development Glossary (2020). With explanations and definitions for literally thousands of terms from Web Development and related fields, building on Wikipedia as well as the MDN Web Docs. Available at Apple Books, Kobo, Google Play Books, and Leanpub.